07/18/2023 / By Ethan Huff
The truth is finally coming out about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) lab leak theory and the efforts that were made all throughout the government bureaucracy to keep a lid on it.
Numerous top scientists told the Republican-led Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic this week that they provided cover for Tony Fauci and other covid kingpins due to the incredible “political” pressure that was placed on them.
With the help of then-director Francis Collins of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Fauci, who led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), “employed fatally flawed scientists,” according to the scientists, in order to “avoid blaming China for the Covid-19 pandemic.”
To date, the subcommittee has received more than 8,000 pages of documents containing more than 25 hours of testimony from everyone involved in creating the March 2020 study entitled “The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2.” That study was published in the Nature journal, having played a critical role in shutting down allegations that covid “leaked” from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
The paper’s four official authors – Kristian Andersen, W. Ian Lipkin, Edward Holmes, and Robert Garry – had privately discussed before publishing that the natural origins theory about covid coming from bat soup at a wet market was impossible. Still, they concluded with dogmatic certainty that “we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.”
(Related: According to Sen. Tom Cotton, communist China is complicit in the coverup of the lab leak theory, which he described as a “smoking gun.”)
What Andersen et al. conveniently failed to include in their paper was a proper ethics declaration showing that Fauci, who oversaw the funding of bat coronavirus research at the WIV, had both commissioned and edited the paper. Congressional investigators later proved that Fauci was, in fact, the paper’s ringleader.
Around the same time his paper was published in the Nature journal under the authors’ names, Fauci gave huge “grants” to these scientists. In other words, Fauci participated in a pay-for-play bribery scheme whereby he paid off these scientists to lie in a prominent science journal about the true origins of covid.
Were it not for Fauci sending tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars to the WIV for bat coronavirus research, there never would have been a covid outbreak or associated “pandemic.” This makes Fauci the number-one perpetrator of the global genocide that ensued.
Keep in mind that Fauci repeatedly cited this paper on the national stage as if it had been independently conducted by scientists. The truth, though, is that Fauci himself commissioned, edited, and determined the conclusive outcome of the paper’s findings, paving the way for a global covid genocide.
“This is one of the single most impactful and influential scientific papers in history … express[ing] conclusions that were not based on sound science nor in fact, but instead on assumptions,” the subcommittee said about its findings, adding that what has been uncovered and exposed is “the anatomy of a cover-up.”
In order to avoid jeopardizing “international harmony,” the scientists who stamped their names on Fauci’s paper complied with said cover-up, to their own detriment. Now their names are out there as well as being complicit in the covid scam.
According to the subcommittee, there are two possible motives behind the cover-up: either the virologists wanted to “defend China and play diplomat” or they sought to “lessen the likelihood of increased biosafety and laboratory regulations.”
The covid scandal will not come to a close until Fauci and every other criminal involved with masterminding it faces justice for their crimes against humanity. The latest news can be found at Plague.info.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
conspiracy, COVID, covid-19, deception, fake research, Fauci, lab leak, lies, pandemic, politics, Republicans, scientists, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Tony Fauci
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author